3 ways to make your participatory tools more effective

Participatory methods emerged as an alternative tool to traditional-style development methods in the 1970s and have been well-used for development practice since the 1990s. The tools have become popular among researchers because they challenge the traditional top-down system of work by propagating a more linear method towards addressing development issues.  Moreover, they are positive and inclusive because they allow researchers to step outside power structures, shed privilege positions and adopt a listening and observing tactic rather than a question-answer approach on field. It allows participants to voice their own reality and define their own empowerment, thereby giving researchers a more realistic approach of the situation.

However, as researchers, it is necessary to take certain precautions while using participatory tools as unintended consequences can be detrimental to the scope of the social program. Here are a few things which I feel are essential to be considered by development professionals when using participatory tools:

  1. Be conscious about existing norms and structures

Since participatory tools are often used as a quick method to get data and information when there are time constraints, it is significant to keep in mind local customs and values and be aware about existing power structures and gender relations in the community. Disconnect and differences in beliefs between development professionals and communities can be stark. This can be resolved by doing prior secondary research before field visits, or time permitting, connecting with people who have lived or worked there – to comprehend popular beliefs, notions and idiosyncrasies. This will help in understanding the context before visiting the field as well as avoiding any surprises.

  1. Do not misrepresent or ignore data

In line with the above point, development practitioners should be empathetic, non-judgemental and not make assumptions about the participants’ way of life.  Evident issues, if present, such as rigid gender norms and power structures can be discussed in a non-threatening way by opening spaces for healthy conversations rather than outright attacking them for their traditionally held beliefs and values.

As such, facilitators should constantly work on their observation, facilitation and interview skills and rapport-building efforts so that data is not misrepresented or ignored and that they are sensitive to non-verbal cultural cues. As posed by Robert Chambers in 1997, these questions should be constantly on the researcher’s mind:

  • Whose knowledge counts?
  • Whose values?
  • Whose criteria and preferences?
  • Whose appraisal, analysis and planning?
  • Whose action?
  • Whose monitoring and evaluation?
  • Whose learning?
  • Whose empowerment?
  • Whose reality counts?

This will help in analysing all perspectives and information without biases taking the lead.

  1. Do not dominate the process

Likewise, facilitators should pay attention to the participation process by taking a step back, and allowing participant to take the centre-stage. If researchers notice non-participation from marginalised groups, alternate spaces should be created for them to participate effectively. For example, if community leaders are dominating activities and exercises, the facilitator should find ways to steer power away from them towards marginalised or subordinate groups or conduct activities with them separately. Lastly, all stakeholders should be identified and engaged with to get wider perspective of the topic.

In the end, participatory tools are a reflective practice for both the researcher and the participant.

-Chandni Patel, Research Associate

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *