All Blogs

MEAL vs M&E comes down to how organisations want to collect, interpret, and use program evidence. This guide compares their core functions, differences, and suitable applications while covering the evolution of M&E, the role of MEAL, framework design, accountability, learning, and the future direction of evidence systems in development and social impact programs.

The pillars of CSR provide a practical structure for managing responsibility across social, environmental, societal, and governance priorities. This guide explains each pillar, how they work together, alternative CSR models covering ethical, philanthropic, and economic responsibility, and practical steps for building a balanced, measurable CSR strategy.

Different programs create different forms of change, so organisations need assessment approaches suited to their outcomes and evidence needs. This guide covers eight types of impact assessment, including social, environmental, economic, CSR, health, climate, human rights, and business assessments. It also explains common methods, tools, and sector-specific applications.

Impact assessment helps organisations understand the social, economic, environmental, health, and organisational changes associated with their interventions. This guide explains its purpose, major types, benefits, key components, stakeholder roles, frameworks, tools, and common challenges. It also clarifies impact assessment vs impact evaluation and shows how credible evidence can strengthen programs and decision-making.

A social impact consulting firm can help healthcare programs identify delivery gaps, strengthen impact measurement, and improve decisions using reliable evidence. This blog explores five ways consulting supports better healthcare delivery, the role of program evaluation, key areas where consultants add value, when organisations should seek external expertise, and how 4th Wheel supports stronger healthcare outcomes.

Livelihood-based CSR programs can help communities build stronger income pathways through skills, entrepreneurship, financial inclusion, agriculture, and market access. This blog explores their key benefits, the communities that can gain the most, and how livelihood initiatives compare with short-term welfare. It also examines how CSR advisory services can strengthen program design, measurement, implementation, and long-term impact.

Confused about the difference between a Theory of Change and a Logical Framework? Review the graphic below to know more:</p>

AI support and human judgement in SROI, showing how AI can summarise data, draft insights and organise evidence while people assess materiality, validate findings and make decisions With the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, one question which came up was: "Can AI support an SROI?" SROI is an evidence-based, stakeholder-centred methodology. While AI is becoming remarkably good at processing information, it cannot replace the

SROI compared with other evaluation methods, including monitoring frameworks, impact evaluation, cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-benefit analysis, highlighting SROI’s focus on value relative to investment. During our recent Social Impact Dialogue on Social Return on Investment (SROI) on 29th July 2026, over 250 practitioners from NGOs, CSR foundations, philanthropy, consulting firms and academia joined us to learn about two use cases of the methodology. While we managed

SROI findings used beyond the final ratio to improve programme design, allocate resources, communicate value and inform decision-making One of the biggest misconceptions about SROI is that the final output is simply a ratio: ₹4 of social value for every ₹1 invested. In reality, the most valuable part of an SROI often lies in the insights it generates about what worked, for whom, why, and what should change next. The questions we received during the webinar highlighted an impo

SROI process for assigning financial value to outcomes, moving from defining an outcome and gathering evidence to selecting a credible financial proxy and determining value. One of the most debated and often misunderstood parts of Social Return on Investment is financial valuation. How do we assign a value to something like student agency, community empowerment, cleaner rivers or the preservation of traditional knowledge? And once a value has been selected, how do we know tha

Theory of Change pathway from inputs and activities to outputs, outcomes and impact, showing how SROI builds on this pathway by assigning value to outcomes. One of the most common questions during our webinar was whether organisations should develop a Theory of Change before undertaking an SROI study. The answer is simple: you can start from either direction. Both approaches are valid, and each serves a different purpose. Approach 1: Start With Your Theory Of Change Many NGOs